Online petition “Justice for Modi’s wife” gets tremendous response

50

jashodaben

By MM News,

Advertisement

New Delhi : PM Modi’s politically aimed shot at rescuing Muslim women from triple talaq has backfired rather badly.

The PM’s show of concern for welfare of Muslim women triggered criticism from various quarters. Apart from innumerable opinion pieces criticizing the PM for double standards an online petition titled ‘Justice for Jashodaben’ has been started by Mission Possible for Justice & Rights.

The petition says that, “In Islam, women are active agents in marriage and divorce, having rights to marry who they want and seek divorce if they want. The issue of triple talaq like you would want the people of this country to believe is not prevalent in the Muslim community. The unfortunate cases, where such incidents have been witnessed, the community by and large has strongly stood by the victim, and the law of the land has also ruled in their favour”

“While the issue of triple talaq, is a contentious one, in the Muslim community itself, with no legitimacy found for the practice in the Holy Qur’an and the books of Hadiths (Sayings of the Prophet (SAWS)), we the undersigned would want to ask Mr Prime Minister, what is the crime of your wife Jashodaben, who you abandoned after marrying, without giving her the rights of a wife, which she, like every other married woman deserves?”

The petition asks the Prime Minister to first put his own house in order before giving hollow speeches to trump up communal discord in the country?

It further reads “Not only have you deprived Jashodaben, the rights of a wife, you have also deprived her of the rights, which she as a citizen of this country deserves. In 2015, when Jashodaben tried to get a passport to travel abroad, to visit her family and friends, her application was returned because “there was no marriage certificate or a joint affidavit with the spouse”. And according to the passport office, a marriage certificate or a joint affidavit is a required document to get the passport.”

“Not only your wife, you also ruined the life of a young girl, from Ahmedabad in Gujarat, who was tailed, stalked, taped, tracked, snooped, spied upon by dozens of Gujarat state police, Crime Branch police, State Intelligence Bureau officials, Anti-Terrorism Squad, which was done under the instructions of the then State Minister of Home Amit Shah for his ‘Saheb’, who turned out to be none other than you.”

Referring to Gujarat riots, best bakery case the petition says that “a person like you, giving lectures on women’s rights is drenched in hypocrisy, because the world knows, how much you took care of Muslim women when they were being raped and burnt by mobs under your nose”.

“So, Mr. Prime Minister, stop shedding crocodile tears and stop patronizing Muslim women. If you really mean, what you say, then apologize and stand trial for the crimes you have committed against Muslim women, against your wife and against the young women who was stalked under your orders. Every other conversation starts after that”, the petition says.

So far the petition has garnered more than 5000 supporters.

To sign the  petition click here.

50 COMMENTS

  1. yaa it is relevant
    modI was supposing to give the freedom to Muslim women from the the fear of being divorced but from whichever condition jasodaben has passed through is also putting up question on PM modi
    his wife is also victim of PM’s deed
    we don’t know the things between them but this subject may be politically used
    triple talaaq should be banned but leader who is appealing has lots of allegations which will make it complicated

    • IT IS SIMPLE
      JUST IMAGINE HOW WEAK ARE SO CALLED HINDU LEADERS
      FEW WOMEN FILED CASE IN COURT ABOUT TRIPLE TALAK
      THEN GOVT ASKED IT TO BE BANNED
      MR MODI OUR HERO KEPT MUM , AS IF TO APPEAR AS HERO IN THE END

      THEN MUSLIMS PROTESTED SOME BLINDLY AND GREAT MAJORITY WITH REASON.

      MR NAIDU SAID IT SHOULD BE ABOLISHED(GREAT ISLAMIC SCHOLAR)
      MR MODI SAID IT SHOULD BE ABOLISHED ….(GREAT ISLAMIC SCHOLAR)

      WHOLE WORLD KEPT CRYING FOUL FOUL FOUL

      THEN HEROS OF RSS SAID IT IS HUMAN RIGHTS ISSUE.
      AGAIN GREAT HEROS OF RSS SAID IT MUSLIMS PERSONAL ISSUES..

      CAN YOU IMAGINE HOW THEY TWISTING THEIR TONGUES

      ONE CAN NOT TRUST SUCH PEOPLE ….
      WHAT GOOD THESE PEOPLE WILL DO WHO HAVE NOT PROPAGATED WORSHIP OF ONE GOD MENTIONED IN VEDAS…

      NOW I WILL TELL YOU, FEW FREAK HEAD MUSLIMS DO IT….
      SOME SELFSERVING MUSLIMS USE IT LIKE ANY OTHER SOCIAL EVILS IN HINDUS
      LOOK INTO DAILY RAPES,MURDERS. RAMPANT PROSTITUTION ,DAY LIGHT HUMILIATION OF GIRLS ,FORCED PROSTITUTION ..FEMALE INFATICIDES, FAMERS PLIGHTS IN MAHARASHTRA ,THE RICHEST STATE ….

      I DONT WANT TO MENTION MORE I FEEL SHAME TELLING IT……THERE IS MALE CASTRATIONS IN SOUTH INDIA ,A DELIBERATE ACT…

      TRIPLE TALAK IS REAL ISSUE ,BUT IT SHOULD BE DISCUSSED BY ISLAMIC SCHOLARS ,,,,INTERNATIONAL ,NOT POLITICIANS OR HUNGRY STOMACH SCHOLARS WHO WILL DECIDE ACCORDING TO WHAT GOVT SAYS OR GOVT APPOINTED MOULVIS …

    • Ever Since came to Power. Whole India drowned in killing & chaos. Modi fever increased & increased.
      What He will do for Muslim Women when He cannot clean his own backyard with all Jarus.
      What a Joke a man who did not give right to his own spouse will help Muslim women.
      Vote cry???????????????

  2. He follows what RSS Ideology Told,he likes too much advices of RSS ideology. So he avoid his wife and round d world like a gentleman.

  3. There is no peition that how to have india better future of youth and creation of jobs .this stupidity will not give jobs.all above comments are fucked

    • Our pm knows only how to be in charcha alwys and nothing else except vote banking there are lots os issues crying in india no one look towards our poverty.edn.epmloyment and many more not only pm bt also all d politicians target is to unnecessary issue me uljha ke logo ku itna dstrb kardo ke des ki jaruri bate bhul jae

  4. The supremacist communally hatred monger and sociopath, modi shud be hanged. For the crime he has done to his wife for leaving her as a log of wood without concerned about her emotional, economic, psychological and bnatural bodily needs.

  5. Don’t you see how Secular Hindu is silent here. He will not say a word against his RSS companion. Modi says: Teen talaq na do. Ek bhi na do; sali ko aisa hi bhaga do jaise maine kiya.
    Sale sab chor hai.

  6. MODI tum pehle apni dholo kyunke dunya ko tumhari (badbo smell) bahuth aarahi hai phir hum Muslims ki dhone ke baare sochna.

  7. Modi should accept her. when its disclosed that he has a wife he must give honour to his life partner and maintain our valuable Indian culture.

    • SHE HAS ALREADY SUFFERED ENOUGH.MR MODI SHOULD RESIGN FROM PM SEAT AND APOLOGIZE TO NATION…
      I TOO FOLLOW MR MODI AND ABANDON MY LOVE SOON

  8. You cannot compare modi’s separation with his wife with triple talaq. To understand this, you will have to understand how Modi got separated from his wife. When Modi was hardly 18 yrs old, his family decided to marry him with Jashodaben. However, Modi’s inclination was towards spirituality & hence he spent hardly 3 months with her & decided to travel India as RSS pracharak. He never got married with his own choice. It is very important to note that he has been following brahmacharya like swami Vivekanand or Mahatma Gandhi followed. Jashodaben had right to get remarried however she did not do that because she was devoted to her husband. I think both of them have shown high level of sacrification in materialistic world. I must add here that vegetarianism & brahmacharya are two important pillars of hindu religion. Human being can reach to god through these pillars.
    Modi’s marital life is similar to lord Buddha & lord Mahaviv Jain who also left their wife.
    So comparing Modi’s married life with triple talaq shows immaturity because one is high spiritual sacrifice & other is right of women in material world.

    • @Secular Hindu
      ok… so your this so-called avtaar of Lord Buddha and Lord Mahavir who is in brahmacharya ….was ruining the life of a young girl, from Ahmedabad in Gujarat, who was tailed, stalked, taped, tracked, snooped, spied upon by dozens of Gujarat state police, Crime Branch police, State Intelligence Bureau officials, Anti-Terrorism Squad, which was done under the instructions of the then State Minister of Home Amit Shah for his ‘Saheb’. i.e. this “brhamachari’… be ashemed how you can compare this cunning man with Lord Buddha and Mahaveer… this person is like a vampire under whose rein the helpless women were raped and murdered.. he even knows who done.. he saved all the criminals.. including himself…. justice denied… he is most hatred person .. a puppet of RSS.. ruling this country from nagpur…

    • IF EVERY BODY IS VEGETARIAN AND BRAMCHARYA WHERE THE WOMEN SHOULD GO IF ONE WANTS TO BECOME GOOD HINDU
      AND ABOUT EATING NON VEG ////READ THIS AND ANSWER
      “””””Eating cows in vedas
      That the Aryans of the Rig Veda did kill cows for purposes of food and ate beef is abundantly clear from the Rig Veda itself. In Rig Veda (X. 86.14) Indra says: ‘They cook for one 15 plus twenty oxen”. The Rig Veda (X.91.14) says that for Agni were sacrificed horses, bulls, oxen, barren cows and rams.
      Below are the quotes from Vedas which prove that Vedic -Hindus were cow eaters.
      Manusmriti (Chapter 5 / Verse 30) says, “It is not sinful to eat meat of eatable animals, for Brahma has created both the eaters and the eatables.”
      Maharishi Yagyavalkya says in Shatpath Brahmin (3/1/2/21) that, “I eat beef because it is very soft and delicious.”
      Apastamb Grihsutram (1/3/10) says, “The cow should be slaughtered on the arrival of a guest, on the occasion of ‘Shraddha’ of ancestors and on the occasion of a marriage.”
      Rigveda (10/85/13) declares, “On the occasion of a girl’s marriage oxen and cows are slaughtered.”
      Rigveda (6/17/1) states that “Indra used to eat the meat of cow, calf, horse and buffalo.”
      Vashistha Dharmasutra (11/34) writes, “If a Brahmin refuses to eat the meat offered to him on the occasion of ‘Shraddha’ or worship, he goes to hell.”
      Hinduism’s greatest propagator Swami Vivekanand said thus: “You will be surprised to know that according to ancient Hindu rites and rituals, a man cannot be a good Hindu who does not eat beef”. (The Complete Works of Swami Vivekanand, vol.3, p. 536).
      Adi Shankaracharya’ commentary on Brihdaranyakopanishad 6/4/18 says : ‘Odan’ (rice) mixed with meat is called ‘Mansodan’. On being asked whose meat it should be, he answers ‘Uksha’. ‘Uksha’ is used for an ox, which is capable to produce semen.
      • The book ‘The History and Culture of the Indian People’, published by Bhartiya Vidya Bhawan, Bombay and edited by renowned historian R.C.Majumdar (Vol.2, page 578) says: “this is said in the Mahabharat that King Rantidev used to kill two thousand other animals in addition to two thousand cows daily in order to give their meat in charity”.
      Now coming back to ancient Indian history as back as Mahabharata, 500 B.C.:
      1) King Rantiveda slaughters 2,000 cows a day in his royal kitchens and distributed beef along with grain to apparently grateful Brahmins, the Hindu priests.
      2) Charak Samhita, 100 B.C.: Flesh of cow is prescribed as a medicine for various diseases. It is also prescribed for making soup and advised as a cure for irregular fever, consumption, and emaciation. The fat of the cow is recommended for debility and rheumatism.
      3) Taittiriya Brahman , 500 B.C.: Verily the cow is food.
      4) Yajnavalkya, one of the most popular Hindu sages: ”Some people do not eat cow meat. I do so, provided it’s tender.”
      5)Sacrificial offering for Indra, the rain God and Agni, the fire God, are bulls and cows. (Perhaps that is why we are having less rain, as we stopped sacrificing cows.)
      6)Vedas have mentioned 250 animals out of which at least 50 are fit for sacrifice and human consumption.
      7) Manusmriti did not prohibit the consumption of beef.

      READ FEW MANUSMIRITI AND VEDIC VERSES WHICH ASKS FOR NOT TO EAT BEEF.
      Anumantaa vishasitaa nihantaa krayavikrayee
      Samskartaa chopahartaa cha khadakashcheti ghaatakaah
      Manusmrithi 5.51
      Those who permit slaying of animals; those who bring animals for slaughter; those who slaughter; those who sell meat; those who purchase meat; those who prepare dish out of it; those who serve that
      meat and those who eat are all murderers.
      Ya aamam maansamadanti paurusheyam cha ye kravih
      Garbhaan khaadanti keshavaastaanito naashayaamasi
      Atharvaveda 8.6.23

      We ought to destroy those who eat cooked as well as uncooked meat, meat involving destruction of males and females, foetus and eggs.
      Anago hatya vai bheema kritye
      Maa no gaamashvam purusham vadheeh
      Atharvaveda 10.1.29

      It is definitely a great sin to kill innocents. Do not kill our cows, horses and people.
      How could there be justification of cow and other animals being killed when killing is so clearly prohibited in the Vedas
      Aghnyaa yajamaanasya pashoonpahi
      Yajurveda 1.1
      “O human! animals are Aghnya – not to be killed. Protect the animals”
      Section 3: No beef in Vedas
      Not only the Vedas are against animal slaughter but also vehemently oppose and prohibit cow slaughter.Yajurveda forbids killing of cows, for they provide energizing food for human beings
      ———————————
      Ghrtam duhaanaamaditim janaayaagne maa himsiheeh
      Yajurveda 13.49
      Do not kill cows and bulls who always deserve to be protected.

      SOME PEOPLE MENTIONS VEDAS REFERENCES WHICH ASKS FOR ANIMALS TO BE EATEN AND SOME VEDIC VERSES BANS IT TOTALLY.
      ARE VEDAS DOUBTFUL.
      I T REQUIRES SCHOLARLY STUDY TO ANALYSE EATING OF BEEf IN HINDUS AND WHAT MANUSMIRITI AND VEDAS ASKS FOR

      • Dear JAINUDDIN,
        Brahmacharya is applicable on men & women both because both are ultimately pure souls only. According to hinduism, sex should be used only for purpose & not for pleasure. Here purpose means giving birth to children. Thus, hinduism prohibits sex between husband & wife if it is done for pleasure.
        The quotations you have given here on Vedas are translations & not original shlokas in Sanskrit. Many western authors have translated Vedas into English with limited knowledge of Sanskrit. It is explained many times by hindu scholars that these translations are wrong. You can find correct meaning of above verses at http://www.vedicgranth.org/misconceptions-on-vedas

        • VIEW ABOUT SEX IN ISLAM AND VEDA IS SAME …..BUT ALLAH IS GREAT TO PARDON WHO EXCEEDS ,,,,,
          READ THIS NEWS IN MUSLIM MIRROR

          “””””Rigveda, Manusmiriti sanction beef-eating
          A recent photograph of some Hindu protesters demanding a ban on non-vegetarian food in restaurants and government canteens in India made me sit up and take notice. I believe that these protesters are ignorant of what their religion preaches. They are simply going against their own religious scriptures.

          Most of the world religions sanctify offering of animals in sacrifice including Hinduism. Hindu scriptures are witnesses to such sacrifices and killings of animals for consumption. References of such commands are replete in Hindu scriptures like Manusmriti, Vedas, Upanishads, Brahmins, Grihsutras, Dharmasutras and others.

          This column would not suffice for quoting all such references but a few from different scriptures are imperative to bring home the point and clear the misconceptions:
          Manusmriti (Chapter 5 / Verse 30) says, “It is not sinful to eat meat of eatable animals, for Brahma has created both the eaters and the eatables.”

          Manusmriti (5 / 35) states: When a man who is properly engaged in a ritual does not eat meat, after his death he will become a sacrificial animal during twenty-one rebirths.

          Maharishi Yagyavalkya says in Shatpath Brahmin (3/1/2/21) that, “I eat beef because it is very soft and delicious.”
          Apastamb Grihsutram (1/3/10) says, “The cow should be slaughtered on the arrival of a guest, on the occasion of ‘Shraddha’ of ancestors and on the occasion of a marriage.”
          Rigveda (10/85/13) declares, “On the occasion of a girl’s marriage oxen and cows are slaughtered.”
          Rigveda (6/17/1) states that “Indra used to eat the meat of cow, calf, horse and buffalo.”
          Vashistha Dharmasutra (11/34) writes, “If a Brahmin refuses to eat the meat offered to him on the occasion of ‘Shraddha’ or worship, he goes to hell.”

          Also, comments of some great scholars of Hinduism are also worth noting:
          • Hinduism’s greatest propagator Swami Vivekanand said thus: “You will be surprised to know that according to ancient Hindu rites and rituals, a man cannot be a good Hindu who does not eat beef”. (The Complete Works of Swami Vivekanand, vol.3, p. 536).
          • Mukandilal writes in his book ‘Cow Slaughter – Horns of a Dilemma’, page 18: “In ancient India, cow-slaughter was considered auspicious on the occasions of some ceremonies. Bride and groom used to sit on the hide of a red ox in front of the ‘Vedi’ (alter).”
          • A renowned scholar of scriptures Dr. Pandurang Vaman Kane says, “Bajsancyi Samhita sanctifies beef-eating because of its purity”. (Dharmashastra Vichar Marathi, page 180)
          • Adi Shankaracharya’ commentary on Brihdaranyakopanishad 6/4/18 says : ‘Odan’ (rice) mixed with meat is called ‘Mansodan’. On being asked whose meat it should be, he answers ‘Uksha’. ‘Uksha’ is used for an ox, which is capable to produce semen.
          • The book ‘The History and Culture of the Indian People’, published by Bhartiya Vidya Bhawan, Bombay and edited by renowned historian R.C.Majumdar (Vol.2, page 578) says: “this is said in the Mahabharat that King Rantidev used to kill two thousand other animals in addition to two thousand cows daily in order to give their meat in charity”.

          It seems a great majority of the followers of Hinduism are not in contact with their religious scriptures thus falling an easy prey to the fascist forces like the Sangh Parivar who have nothing to offer to the Indian society save hatred. And all Indians know where these hatred-mongers are taking India to?

          AND
          .
          Why did Swami Vivekananda say this: “According to ancient Hindu rites and rituals, a man cannot be a good Hindu who does not eat beef”?

          READ ABOUT CONCEPT OF GOD ,IF WHAT IS WRITTEN IS TRUE THEN WHY DONT YOU WORSHIP ONE GOD OF VEDAS AND WHERE IS THE PLACE OF WORSHIP FOR ONE GOD……

          “”””Concept of God according to Hindu Scriptures:
          We can gain a better understanding of the concept of God in Hinduism by analysing Hindu scriptures.
          BHAGAVAD GITA
          The most popular amongst all the Hindu scriptures is the Bhagavad Gita.
          Consider the following verse from the Gita: “Those whose intelligence has been stolen by material desires surrender unto demigods and follow the particular rules and regulations of worship according to their own natures.” [Bhagavad Gita 7:20]
          The Gita states that people who are materialistic worship demigods i.e. ‘gods’ besides the True God.
          UPANISHADS:
          The Upanishads are considered sacred scriptures by the Hindus.
          The following verses from the Upanishads refer to the Concept of God:
          “Ekam evadvitiyam”
          “He is One only without a second.”
          [Chandogya Upanishad 6:2:1]1
          “Na casya kascij janita na cadhipah.”
          “Of Him there are neither parents nor lord.”
          [Svetasvatara Upanishad 6:9]2
          “Na tasya pratima asti”
          “There is no likeness of Him.”
          [Svetasvatara Upanishad 4:19]3
          The following verses from the Upanishad allude to the inability of man to imagine God in a particular form:
          “Na samdrse tisthati rupam asya, na caksusa pasyati kas canainam.”
          “His form is not to be seen; no one sees Him with the eye.”
          [Svetasvatara Upanishad 4:20]4
          THE VEDAS
          Vedas are considered the most sacred of all the Hindu scriptures. There are four principal Vedas: Rigveda, Yajurveda, Samveda and Atharvaveda.
          Yajurveda
          The following verses from the Yajurveda echo a similar concept of God:
          “na tasya pratima asti
          “There is no image of Him.”
          [Yajurveda 32:3]5
          “shudhama poapvidham”
          “He is bodyless and pure.”
          [Yajurveda 40:8]6
          “Andhatama pravishanti ye asambhuti mupaste”
          “They enter darkness, those who worship the natural elements” (Air, Water, Fire, etc.). “They sink deeper in darkness, those who worship sambhuti.”
          [Yajurveda 40:9]7
          Sambhuti means created things, for example table, chair, idol, etc.
          The Yajurveda contains the following prayer:
          “Lead us to the good path and remove the sin that makes us stray and wander.”
          [Yajurveda 40:16]8
          Atharvaveda
          The Atharvaveda praises God in Book 20, hymn 58 and verse 3:
          “Dev maha osi”
          “God is verily great”
          [Atharvaveda 20:58:3]9
          Rigveda
          The oldest of all the vedas is Rigveda. It is also the one considered most sacred by the Hindus. The Rigveda states in Book 1, hymn 164 and verse 46:
          “Sages (learned Priests) call one God by many names.”
          [Rigveda 1:164:46]
          The Rigveda gives several different attributes to Almighty God. Many of these are mentioned in Rigveda Book 2 hymn 1.
          Among the various attributes of God, one of the beautiful attributes mentioned in the Rigveda Book II hymn 1 verse 3, is Brahma. Brahma means ‘The Creator’. Translated into Arabic it means Khaaliq. Muslims can have no objection if Almighty God is referred to as Khaaliq or ‘Creator’ or Brahma. However if it is said that Brahma is Almighty God who has four heads with each head having a crown, Muslims take strong exception to it.
          Describing Almighty God in anthropomorphic terms also goes against the following verse of Yajurveda:
          “Na tasya Pratima asti”
          “There is no image of Him.”
          [Yajurveda 32:3]
          Another beautiful attribute of God mentioned in the Rigveda Book II hymn 1 verse 3 is Vishnu. Vishnu means ‘The Sustainer’. Translated into Arabic it means Rabb. Again, Muslims can have no objection if Almighty God is referred to as Rabb or ‘Sustainer’ or Vishnu. But the popular image of
          Vishnu among Hindus, is that of a God who has four arms, with one of the right arms holding the Chakra, i.e. a discus and one of the left arms holding a ‘conch shell’, or riding a bird or reclining on a snake couch. Muslims can never accept any image of God. As mentioned earlier this also goes against Svetasvatara Upanishad Chapter 4 verse 19.
          “Na tasya pratima asti”
          “There is no likeness of Him”
          The following verse from the Rigveda Book 8, hymn 1, verse 1 refer to the Unity and Glory of the Supreme Being:
          “Ma cid anyad vi sansata sakhayo ma rishanyata”
          “O friends, do not worship anybody but Him, the Divine One. Praise Him alone.”
          [Rigveda 8:1:1]10
          “Devasya samituk parishtutih”
          “Verily, great is the glory of the Divine Creator.”
          [Rigveda 5:1:81]11
          Brahma Sutra of Hinduism:
          The Brahma Sutra of Hinduism is:
          “Ekam Brahm, dvitiya naste neh na naste kinchan”
          “There is only one God, not the second; not at all, not at all, not in the least bit.”
          Thus only a dispassionate study of the Hindu scriptures can help one understand the concept of God in Hinduism.

          • Dear JAINUDDIN,
            Vedas have described one path considering God has no form i.e. as Nirvikaar. However, if you read other verses of Vedas, it has also explained how to serve god which has a form i.e. Sakaar. Hinduism offers several paths to reach god. I suggest you to study complete Vedas instead of only those shlokas where you find convenience.
            ‘Idol worship comes when any devotee is considering god as ‘Sakaar’. Can you tell me name of any muslim who reached heaven? No.. However I can tell you several hindus who reached heaven by considering god as ‘Sakaar’ i.e. doing idol worship. One name is saint Tukaram. He went to heaven with his body itself & it has happened 300 years ago.
            So, my point is idol worship may be prohibited in Islam but supported in hinduism. Supreme lord Krishna has also suggested to worship mountain ‘Givardhan’ in Mahabharata.
            So please do not comment about hinduism with limited knowledge.

    • Do you mean Jasoda Ben has no right as a wife especially when Modiji himself acknowledged her as his wife. By any stretch of imagination our Prime minister cannot be equated with Budha or Mahathma. Budha competely renounced the materialistic world and did only good to the mankind. Unlike him Modi wielded and still wielding power, enjoying all fruits of material world and did nothing to prevent the rape and burning of women WHO WERE UNDER HIS CARE AND STEWARDSHIP AS ELECTED CHIEF MINISTER. WHEN ALL ATROCITIES against hapless women were perpetrated by his own people at stones throw from the secretariat he was a fiddling Nero as observed by the Supreme Court. So my brother,SecularHindu,please don’t try to eulogise a person who has not even repented for what happened during Gujarath riots, to women in particular.

    • pl do not compare Modiji to M Gandhi or LordG Budh or Lord Mahaveer.They Dedicated their life for Welbeing of the entire Humanity .They never uttered a single lie nor gave any empty hopes in their entire life span. Their teachings are immortal and their life is a living monument to the entire world .Gandhiji lived with Kasuri bai ji Neve deserted her . No wonder people may compre or equate Modiji to Lord Rama Lord Krishna and other Gods in future .Kaunq Ke–Sach ku bolne ki tameej nahi hai–Jhoot Bahutu meetha bolts hain.

    • I never compared Modi’s life with Gandhi or Buddha. Gandhi & Buddha are great personalities & Modi stands no where. I was only talking about his marital life. I accept that Modi is responsible for Gujrat riots & did not help innocent muslims.

  9. Hypocrisy of AIMPLB.. want Minority Reservation, Haj Subsidy and prefer Punishment for Crimes According to INDIAN Law … But Perks of Four + Wives and Triple Talaq according to Sharia Law wowwwwww Uniform Civil Code means law will be same for everyone. No religion based discount. Secularism is incomplete without Uniform Civil Code.

    • AIMPLB IS ASKING FOR RESERVATIONS INSTAED OF HELPING MUSLIMS GET BETTER EDUCATION,WE IN SOUTH INDIA HAVE GOOD SCHOOLS AND COLLEGES …..HAJ SUBSIDY IS ALSO POLITICAL ACT,
      WE HAVE TO KEEP RESERVATION DEPENDING UPON ECONOMIC CONDITIONS ,BUT INDIANS ARE GREAT CHEATERS ,EVEN A SON OF PERSON WORKING IN CENTRAL GOVT WILL SHOW LOW INCOME CERTIFICATE….
      FOUR WIVES IS GOOD…..REALLY GRAET…I STAY IN MUSLIM LOCALITY ,THERE IS ONLY ONE MAN HAVING TWO WIVES ,,,,I MYSELF HAVE TWO WIVES,,ALL ARE HAPPY.MY FRIEND TRIED TO DO IT BUT COULDNT SECCEED ,HE FAILED MISERABLY…
      BUT I SUCCEEDED HAPPILY

    • THERE ARE THOUSANDS OF HINDUS WHO GOES TO BROTHELS, DANCE BARS ,ENJOY REVELLEARS PARTIES …BUT WE MUSLIM TRY OUR BEST TO STICK TO ONE WIFE OR TWO THREE OR FOUR .THAT TOO HARDLY 2 % MUSLIMS HAVING MORE THAN ONE WIFE THAT MAY BE MAXIMUM TWO,,,,WE DO IT DO MAKE IT EASY TO GET WIDOWS AND DIVORCE LADIES LIFE PARTNER EASILY ..
      OUR PROPHET MOHAMMAD (PBUH) FIRST MARRIED A WIDOW ,OTHERS WERE DIVORCED AND WIDOWED WOMEN THAT TOO AGED EXCEPT ONE WIFE WHO WAS UNMARRIED AND YOUNG…

  10. GOI should sideline AIMPLB and go ahead with Uniform Civil Code. The survey should be conducted for all Muslims and let them decide what they want. In fact, if it is for Women the survey should only be conducted for Women…let them decide how they want to live. Who the hell has given right to the Men and Mullas to decide how Muslim Women should behave.Which Pretends to be the voice of a group or section !Muslims Hardliners don’t want to improve the condition and life style of Muslims, but instead take back to 7th century, like the Wahabis & Salafi are trying.A Woman should be given Equal rights as Men. No religion can become Larger than a Nation! One Country One Law, No Discrimination.Such grave Rituals should be Eradicated in 21st Century,Hatt’s off, Hail India as GOI not playing any Vote Bank Politics, just thinking about Deprived people for Equality. GOI is doing right proves that Constitution is Supreme for it and honoring the Constitution as it should be.

    • MADAME ….FIRST GO HOME AND PREACH ONE GOD MENTIONED IN VEDAS
      JUST IMAGINE HOW WEAK ARE SO CALLED HINDU LEADERS
      FEW WOMEN FILED CASE IN COURT ABOUT TRIPLE TALAK

      THEN MUSLIMS PROTESTED SOME BLINDLY AND GREAT MAJORITY WITH REASON.

      MR NAIDU SAID IT SHOULD BE ABOLISHED
      MR MODI SAID IT SHOULD BE ABOLISHED ….

      WHOLE WORLD KEPT CRYING FOUL FOUL FOUL

      THEN HEROS OF RSS SAID IT IS HUMAN RIGHTS ISSUE.
      AGAIN GREAT HEROS OF RSS SAID IT MUSLIMS PERSONAL ISSUES..

      CAN YOU IMAGINE HOW THEY TWISTING THEIR TONGUES

      ONE CAN NOT TRUST SUCH PEOPLE ….
      WHAT GOOD THESE PEOPLE WILL DO WHO HAVE NOT PROPAGATED WORSHIP OF ONE GOD MENTIONED IN VEDAS…

      NOW I WILL TELL YOU FEW FREAK HEAD MUSLIMS DO IT….
      SOME SELFSERVING MUSLIMS USE IT LIKE ANY OTHER SOCIAL EVILS IN HINDUS
      LOOK INTO DAILY RAPES,MURDERS. RAMPANT PROSTITUTION ,DAY LIGHT HUMILIATION OF GIRLS ,FORCED PROSTITUTION ..FEMALE INFATICIDES, FAMERS PLIGHTS IN MAHARASHTRA ,THE RICHEST STATE ….

      I DONT WANT TO MENTION MORE I FEEL SHAME TELLING IT……THERE IS MALE CASTRATIONS IN SOUTH INDIA ,A DELIBERATE ACT…

      TRIPLE TALAK IS REAL ISSUE ,BUT IT SHOULD BE DISCUSSED BY ISLAMIC SCHOLARS ,,,,INTERNATIONAL ,NOT POLITICIANS OR HUNGRY STOMACH SCHOLARS WHO WILL DECIDE ACCORDING TO WHAT GOVT SAYS OR GOVT APPOINTED MOULVIS …

  11. Triple Talaq (Sinful Practice) has been banned even in the country of origin of Islam…Triple Talaq best example of Terrorism on Women today that too in 2016 is really Pathetic.. (Personal Laws Mostly Keep Alive Defects Of Religion And Religious Leaders Fatwas) i.e Personal Laws Have No Place in Constitution & Religious Laws Have No Place in Secularism.Uniform Civil Code (1 Nation 1 Law), is a must for any Decent Country.One Country One Law, No Discrimination .The Question of National integrity cannot be comprised,India is a Secular State and there has to be One law to protect its Secular state. Which implies that for growth of India and Betterment of Indian.

    • YOU MAY BE RIGHT BUT PEOPLE BEHIND HULLABALU OF TRIPLE TALAK ARE NOT HONEST .

      THE SO CALLED HEROS OF HINDUS HAVE NOT INFORMED MESSAGE OF WORSHIP OF ONE GOD TO HINDUS

      READ YOU OWN HOLY VEDAS AND FOLLOW IT
      CONCEPT OF GOD IN HINDUISM
      1. Common Concept of God in Hinduism:
      Hinduism is commonly perceived as a polytheistic religion. Indeed, most Hindus would attest to this, by professing belief in multiple Gods. While some Hindus believe in the existence of three gods, some believe in thousands of gods, and some others in thirty three crore i.e. 330 million Gods. However, learned Hindus, who are well versed in their scriptures, insist that a Hindu should believe in and worship only one God.
      The major difference between the Hindu and the Muslim perception of God is the common Hindus’ belief in the philosophy of Pantheism. Pantheism considers everything, living and non-living, to be Divine and Sacred. The common Hindu, therefore, considers everything as God. He considers the trees as God, the sun as God, the moon as God, the monkey as God, the snake as God and even human beings as manifestations of God!
      Islam, on the contrary, exhorts man to consider himself and his surroundings as examples of Divine Creation rather than as divinity itself. Muslims therefore believe that everything is God’s i.e. the word ‘God’ with an apostrophe ‘s’. In other words the Muslims believe that everything belongs to God. The trees belong to God, the sun belongs to God, the moon belongs to God, the monkey belongs to God, the snake belongs to God, the human beings belong to God and everything in this universe belongs to God.
      Thus the major difference between the Hindu and the Muslim beliefs is the difference of the apostrophe ‘s’. The Hindu says everything is God. The Muslim says everything is God’s.
      2. Concept of God according to Hindu Scriptures:
      We can gain a better understanding of the concept of God in Hinduism by analysing Hindu scriptures.
      BHAGAVAD GITA
      The most popular amongst all the Hindu scriptures is the Bhagavad Gita.
      Consider the following verse from the Gita: “Those whose intelligence has been stolen by material desires surrender unto demigods and follow the particular rules and regulations of worship according to their own natures.” [Bhagavad Gita 7:20]
      The Gita states that people who are materialistic worship demigods i.e. ‘gods’ besides the True God.
      UPANISHADS:
      The Upanishads are considered sacred scriptures by the Hindus.
      The following verses from the Upanishads refer to the Concept of God:
      “Ekam evadvitiyam”
      “He is One only without a second.”
      [Chandogya Upanishad 6:2:1]1
      “Na casya kascij janita na cadhipah.”
      “Of Him there are neither parents nor lord.”
      [Svetasvatara Upanishad 6:9]2
      “Na tasya pratima asti”
      “There is no likeness of Him.”
      [Svetasvatara Upanishad 4:19]3
      The following verses from the Upanishad allude to the inability of man to imagine God in a particular form:
      “Na samdrse tisthati rupam asya, na caksusa pasyati kas canainam.”
      “His form is not to be seen; no one sees Him with the eye.”
      [Svetasvatara Upanishad 4:20]4
      THE VEDAS
      Vedas are considered the most sacred of all the Hindu scriptures. There are four principal Vedas: Rigveda, Yajurveda, Samveda and Atharvaveda.
      Yajurveda
      The following verses from the Yajurveda echo a similar concept of God:
      “na tasya pratima asti
      “There is no image of Him.”
      [Yajurveda 32:3]5
      “shudhama poapvidham”
      “He is bodyless and pure.”
      [Yajurveda 40:8]6
      “Andhatama pravishanti ye asambhuti mupaste”
      “They enter darkness, those who worship the natural elements” (Air, Water, Fire, etc.). “They sink deeper in darkness, those who worship sambhuti.”
      [Yajurveda 40:9]7
      Sambhuti means created things, for example table, chair, idol, etc.
      The Yajurveda contains the following prayer:
      “Lead us to the good path and remove the sin that makes us stray and wander.”
      [Yajurveda 40:16]8
      Atharvaveda
      The Atharvaveda praises God in Book 20, hymn 58 and verse 3:
      “Dev maha osi”
      “God is verily great”
      [Atharvaveda 20:58:3]9
      Rigveda
      The oldest of all the vedas is Rigveda. It is also the one considered most sacred by the Hindus. The Rigveda states in Book 1, hymn 164 and verse 46:
      “Sages (learned Priests) call one God by many names.”
      [Rigveda 1:164:46]
      The Rigveda gives several different attributes to Almighty God. Many of these are mentioned in Rigveda Book 2 hymn 1.
      Among the various attributes of God, one of the beautiful attributes mentioned in the Rigveda Book II hymn 1 verse 3, is Brahma. Brahma means ‘The Creator’. Translated into Arabic it means Khaaliq. Muslims can have no objection if Almighty God is referred to as Khaaliq or ‘Creator’ or Brahma. However if it is said that Brahma is Almighty God who has four heads with each head having a crown, Muslims take strong exception to it.
      Describing Almighty God in anthropomorphic terms also goes against the following verse of Yajurveda:
      “Na tasya Pratima asti”
      “There is no image of Him.”
      [Yajurveda 32:3]
      Another beautiful attribute of God mentioned in the Rigveda Book II hymn 1 verse 3 is Vishnu. Vishnu means ‘The Sustainer’. Translated into Arabic it means Rabb. Again, Muslims can have no objection if Almighty God is referred to as Rabb or ‘Sustainer’ or Vishnu. But the popular image of
      Vishnu among Hindus, is that of a God who has four arms, with one of the right arms holding the Chakra, i.e. a discus and one of the left arms holding a ‘conch shell’, or riding a bird or reclining on a snake couch. Muslims can never accept any image of God. As mentioned earlier this also goes against Svetasvatara Upanishad Chapter 4 verse 19.
      “Na tasya pratima asti”
      “There is no likeness of Him”
      The following verse from the Rigveda Book 8, hymn 1, verse 1 refer to the Unity and Glory of the Supreme Being:
      “Ma cid anyad vi sansata sakhayo ma rishanyata”
      “O friends, do not worship anybody but Him, the Divine One. Praise Him alone.”
      [Rigveda 8:1:1]10
      “Devasya samituk parishtutih”
      “Verily, great is the glory of the Divine Creator.”
      [Rigveda 5:1:81]11
      Brahma Sutra of Hinduism:
      The Brahma Sutra of Hinduism is:
      “Ekam Brahm, dvitiya naste neh na naste kinchan”
      “There is only one God, not the second; not at all, not at all, not in the least bit.”
      Thus only a dispassionate study of the Hindu scriptures can help one understand the concept of God in Hinduism.

  12. Respect AIMPLB. Theen talaq modis problem how You people like sathi earlier & thousand of dowry blazing cases a year, find solution we r ready to help…

    • ITNE DIN SE AILMPLB SOYA THA KYA KE ABHI TAK TRIPLE TALAK KA KOI LIERATURE KISI BHI SHADI KARNE WALE MUSALMAN KO MALUUM NAHIN HAI……….

      KIS TARAH TRIPLE TALAK DENA HAI KOI JANTA HAI……

      KHUD GALTI KARKE BJP KO BEQUF BANA RAHE AUR MUSLAMANOUN KO BHI

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here