By Muslim Mirror Desk
The decision of the four highest gurus of Sanatan Hindu Dharma not to participate in the Pranpratistha ceremony of the Ram Temple in Ayodhya has stirred significant attention and sparked discussions within the Hindu community. This unexpected turn of events has been attributed to various concerns and perspectives, revealing a complex interplay of tradition, ideology, and political dynamics.
One of the key figures abstaining from the ceremony is Shankaracharya Swami Shri Nischalananda Saraswati of Purvaamnaya Govardhanmath Puri peeth. His refusal is rooted in a perception that the government’s involvement in the temple construction is not centered on creating a sacred space but rather a secular monument. Describing it as a “tomb” rather than a temple, he underscores the absence of what he deems as essential sanctity and reverence in the construction process, leading to his decision to stay away from the event.
Similarly, Shankaracharya Swami Shri Avimukteshwarananda Saraswati of Uttaramnaya Jyotirmath has cited specific concerns for his non-participation. He articulates a broader apprehension, stating, “We are not anti-Modi, but we do not want to be anti-dharamashashtra either.” His concern revolves around the interpretation of Vedic traditions, particularly the exclusive role of Brahmins in priesthood according to the Vedas. He criticizes the appointment of a Shudra as a temple priest, viewing it as a departure from established religious principles outlined in the sacred texts.
The absence of these spiritual leaders points to a deeper ideological rift within the Hindu community. While the general excitement for the Ram Temple Consecration prevails, the disagreement among these revered figures highlights conflicting perspectives on the sanctity and adherence to traditional rituals. The concern over Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s prominent role in the ceremony is another noteworthy aspect. Some senior seers fear that his central position could potentially overshadow the traditional rituals dictated by the Sanatan Shastras, raising questions about the balance between political leadership and religious practices.
The decision not to participate in the Pranpratistha ceremony is seen as a symbolic stand against perceived deviations from established norms and principles. It reflects a commitment to preserving the purity and sanctity of religious practices as dictated by ancient texts. The criticism of the government’s approach and the appointment of a temple priest outside the Brahmin caste underscores the significance attached to adherence to Vedic traditions.
In conclusion, the non-participation of the four highest gurus in the Ram Temple Pranpratistha ceremony is a manifestation of complex factors encompassing concerns about the secularization of the project, adherence to Vedic traditions, and the role of political figures in religious events. This development not only holds religious implications but also reverberates within the broader socio-political landscape, signaling a nuanced intersection of spirituality, tradition, and contemporary governance.