By Muslim Mirror Network
Following his statement that Tulsidas’s Ramcharitmanas “spreads hatred in the society,” Bihar’s education minister Chandra Shekhar sparked a controversy.
“Why was Ramcharitmanas resisted, and what aspect was resisted? The Ramcharitmanas claims that lower caste people turn poisonous by receiving an education, just like a snake does after consuming milk, and that this is why they were not permitted to pursue an education,” said Shekhar.
“These books—Manusmriti, Ramcharitmanas, Bunch of Thoughts by Guru Golwalkar—spread hatred,” he said.
Chandrashekhar made the comments while speaking at the Nalanda Open University convocation ceremony. Phagu Chouhan, the governor of Bihar, attended the occasion as well.
The remarks enraged the BJP, which accused the Bihar minister of attempting to sway a vote bank with the controversial statement.
He was criticized by BJP MP Ravishankar Prasad, who said, “He is an education minister but talks like an illiterate.”
“He is completely unaware of the fact that Ramcharitmanas unites people of all castes and creeds. I’ll ask Nitish Kumar to fire the individual. Kumar is hurting Hindu sentiments by using this minister,” said Shankar.
Bihar Education Minister from RJD (said) “Ramcharit Manas spreads hatred”. A few days ago Jagdanand Singh said “Ram Janmbhoomi is nafrat ki zameen”. This is not Sanyog but Votebank ka Udyog Will action be taken?,” tweeted BJP spokesman Shehzad Poonawalla.
In the meantime, the minister’s dismissal was demanded by Ayodhya seer Jagadguru Paramhans Acharya.
“Within a week, he ought to be fired from his position as minister. The Bihar Education Minister Chandra Shekhar should apologise, and if this does not happen, I declare a reward of Rs. 10 crore for the person who will cut off his tongue,” said Jagadguru Paramhans Acharya of the Tapaswi Chawani Temple.
Ramcharitmanas
The 16th-century Indian bhakti poet Tulsidas wrote the epic poem Ramcharitmanas, which is written in the Awadhi language and is based on the Ramayana (c. 1532–1623). Many Hindus believe that the poem “the splendid lake of Ram’s exploits” is the best ode to Lord Ram.
However, a number of research scholars argue that the poem contains lines that are “either controversial or simply out of context.” The scholars claimed that eight lines were derogatory to Dalits or women.
Manusmriti
The Manusmriti also referred to as the Mnava-Dharmastra or Laws of Manu, is one of the many Dharmastras in Hinduism that serve as a legal code and constitution. The Manu-smriti prescribes to Hindus their dharma, or the set of obligations that each has as a member of one of the four social classes (varnas) and as a person in one of the four stages of life (ashramas).
The Manusmrti has received praise and condemnation. Head of the committee which drafted the Constitution of India B. R. Ambedkar believed Manusmriti was to blame for India’s caste system and was one of the text’s notable Indian critics in the early 20th century. Ambedkar burned Manusmrti in a bonfire on December 25, 1927, as an act of defiance.
According to Ambedkar, despite the fact that caste prejudice stunts a country’s ability to advance spiritually and economically, it has nothing to do with Hinduism or texts like the Manusmriti.
I bow to genius of the Bihar Education Minister,in his expose on Rama the cretin filth.
The Minister is the Indian Aristotle,and just like the Greeks pillaged and destroyed the temples of Egypt and libraries of idolators,(as an GEM ),the Biharis should blow each brick in the Rama temple and burn the Ramayana – of Tulsidas.The Fires in the libraries of Alexandria and Persia (Zend Avesta) burned for months !
Greeks were in Bihar,and so,Biharis have Greek DNA.dindooohindoo
IT IS VALMIKI WHO HAS BLOWN APART RAMA,AND THE BRAHMIN/ KSHATRIYA/BANIA COMBINE.JUST LIKE THE BRAHMINS, WHO CORRUPTED THE SIKH SCRIPTS, TULSIDAS RAMAYANA IS A FANTASY TALE, WHICH EDITS VALMIKI.WHERE WAS RAMA FROM 10 CENTURY BC TO THE TIME OF TULSIDAS. THERE IS NO MENTION ANYWHERE.WHY WAS HE RESURRECTED,BY TULSIDAS ? AS A SYMBOL OF HOPE,AGAINST THE SO CALLED MUGHAL TYRANNY ?
Ambedkar, in his historic speech in Nagpur on October 15, 1956, a day after he had embraced Buddhism, said, “Even though I was born in the Hindu religion, I will not die in the Hindu religion. This oath I made earlier; yesterday, I proved it true. I am happy; I am ecstatic! I have left hell — this is how I feel. I do not want any blind follower
THE BIG PICTURE – VALMIKI
INDIANS ALWAYS MISS THE BIG PICTURE,
WHAT WAS VALMIKI TRYING TO SAY ? VALMIKI WAS MOCKING THE ENTIRE HINDOO RELIGION AND THE IMPOTENT,WEASEL COWARDS OF THE KSHATRIYA RACE, THE BRAHMINS AND ALSO THE DUBIOUS CHASTITY OF SEETA
VERSES IN RAMAYANA PROVE THAT RAMA WAS IMPOTENT AND COULD NOT SEXUALLY SATISFY SEETA. (TESTINONY TO THE POTENCY OF KSHATRIYAS WHO COULD NOT SATISFY OR SAVE THEIR WOMEN. HOW WOULD THEY DEFEND INDIA ?).PERHAPS VALIMIKI’S WIFE LEFT HIM AND HE WAS TAINTING RAMA TO HAVE AN EQUALITY OF IGOMINY
VERSES IN RAMAYANA PROVE THAT DASHRATHA WAS AN IMPOTENTICA WHO GAVE BIRTH TO RAMA WHEN HE WAS 60000 YEARS AGO.VALKMIKI IS SAYING THAT IT IS THIS GENETIC DISASTER THAT EXPLAINS THE DISASTER OF RAMA AND NOT A DIVINE CURSE OR A TAPASYA
VERSES IN RAMAYANA PROVE THAT RAMA WAS BORN BY UNNATURAL SEX, WITH HORSES AND 11 BRAHMINS, AND EATNG KHEER (WHICH IS A PROXY FOR SPERM).WHICH IS Y BRAHMINS LOVE RAMA AND WANT A RAMA TEMPLE! VALMIKI IS SAYING THAT BESTIALITY WAS COMMON AMONG TRIBALS AND THE ELITE
VERSES IN RAMAYNA PROVE THAT DASHRATHA HAD NO SEX WITH KAUSHALYA AND WANTED KAIKEYI AND KAUSHALYA SAID TO RAAM THAT HE GAVE HER NO SATISFACTION OR JOY ! C;LEAR SIGN OF INCEST..SEETA ALSO SAD THAT MEN WERE WAITING TO PAW HER IN THE PALACE,SO THE ROYAL; RAMA PALACE WAS AN ORGY CENTRE.VALMIKI IS TRYING TO STATE THAT SEXUAL PROMISCUITY WAS PASSE THEN, AND THAT EXPLAINS MANUSMRITI
VERSES IN RAMAYANA PROVE THAT RAMA DOUBTED THE CHASTITY AND FIDELITY OF SEETA (PROVING THE MAXI OF MANU SMRITI ON WOMEN)
VERSES IN RAMAYANA PROVE THAT RAMA WAS A DRUNKARD,ATE DEER,RATS,LIZARDS AND MONGOOSE (PROVING THAT – LIKE DALITS ,RAMA ALSO ATE MEAT AND RODENTS AND WAS NO SAINT)
VALMKI USED THE VANAR SENA AS A PROPHECY TO STATE TO THE WORLD THAT THE KSHATRIYAS ARE A RACE OF COWARDS AND WEASELS ,WHO NEEDED APES TO MAKE BRIDGES AND RESCUE A NEPALI WHORE. THIS WAS PROVEN IN THE MUGHAL INVASIONS OF INDIA
VALIMIKI USED THE STORY OF VALI TO PROVE THAT RAMA WAS A WEASEL,TREACHEROUS,COWARDLY SNAKE.THIS IS ALSO A PROPHECY AS WAS PROVEN BY THE BETRAYAL OF THE RAJPUTS AND SIKHS TO THE MUGHALS AND BRITS
VALIMIKI ALSO USED THE SEETA ABDUCTION STORY TO PROVE THAT THE CHASTITY OF UPPER CASTE HINDOOS WAS A LIE.RAVANA TOUCHED THE THIGHS,HIPS AND BREASTS OF SEETA AND PLACED HER MOUTH ON HIS ORGAN – AND HE DID NOT DIE (AS IS SAID THAT SEETA HAD A BOON,THAT ANY MAN WHO TOUCHED HER,W/O CONSENT,WOULD DIE)
VALIMIKI ALSO USED THE SEETA ABDUCTION STORY,TO PROVE THAT THE DRESSAGE OF SEETA , WAS LIKE THE DALIT WOMEN,WHEN SHE MET RAVANA SHE WAS ALMOST COMPLETELY NAKED WITH NO SHAME (ALSO DISPLAYING HER SEXUAL FORLORN-NESS)
VALMIKI ALSO BLEW APART THE CONCEPT OF CELIBACY IN THE DESCRIPTION BY HANOOMAN OF THE NAKED BODY OF SEETA TO RAMA AND THE DESCRIPTION OF THE NAKED BODY OF SEETA TO RAAM..THE ANGLE IS KEY – AS HANOOMANIS TRYING TO SEXUALLY STIMULATE SEETA AND ALSO TO ASSESS IF SHE LOVED RAMA AND WAS TAKEN BY RAVANA.ALSO BHARAT GAVE 16 VIRGINS TO HANOMAN – NOT TO PEEL BANANAS (BUT TO PEEL HIS BANANA)
VALIMIKI IS ALSO SENDING A MESSAGE TO THE WORLD THAT RAMA ,LAXMAN,HANOOMAN ARE ALL GAYLOVERS – AS NO ONE MAN CAN LIVE W//O SEX FOR 14 YEARS AND EATING RAT MEAT (AS IT IS AN APHRODASIAC).HANOOMAN DESCRIBES RAMA’S NAKED BODY TO SEETA .HOW DID HANOOMAN KNOW ?
VALMIKI ALSO STATES THAT RAMA HAD BLOCK LOTUS SKIN WITH HANDS WHICH FELL TO HIS KNEES – JUST LIKE NEGROIDS ,AND SO, HE LOOKED LIKE DALITS.SO RAMAYANA WAS A WAR BETWEEN 2 NEGROIDS OVER A NEPALI RANDI ! NOT A DHARMIC WAR ! THAT IS BOTH DESERVED TO DIE
THE 17 GEMS OF WISDOM WHICH EVEN AMBEDKAR MISSED OUT
Rama – The Limpdick Othello Paradox
LET US EXAMINE RAMA AND HIS NEPALEE RANDEE WIFE,SEETA MAIYA (THE MATA OF HINDOOS),FROM THE ANGLE OF THE LIMPDICK OF RAMA !
GEM 1 – Sita called Rama an Impotent Pansy
Book II : Ayodhya Kanda – Book Of Ayodhya Chapter[Sarga] 30
किम् त्वा अमन्यत वैदेहः पिता मे मिथिला अधिपः | राम जामातरम् प्राप्य स्त्रियम् पुरुष विग्रहम् || २-३०-३
“What my father, the king of Mithila belonging to the country of Videha, think of himself having got as so-in-law you, a woman having the form of a man?”
अनृतम् बल लोको अयम् अज्ञानात् यद्द् हि वक्ष्यति | तेजो न अस्ति परम् रामे तपति इव दिवा करे || २-३०-४
GEM 2 -NOW U WILL SAY Y ? SIMPLE ! RAMA THE LIMPDICK WAS BORN VIDE HIS SO-CALLED LIMPDICK FATHER,WHEN HE WAS 60000 YEARS OLD ! WHAT WILL HAPPEN WHEN U PRODUCE BABIES AT AGE 60000 ? WHAT WAS HE DOING FOR 60000 YEARS ? TRYING HARD – WITH NO SUCCESS !
Book I : Bala Kanda – The Youthful Majesties
Chapter [Sarga] 20
षष्टिर्वर्षसहस्राणि जातस्य मम कौशिक || १-२०-१०
कृच्छ्रेणोत्पादितश्चायं न रामं नेतुमर्हसि |
“Sixty thousand years have passed from my birth, oh! Vishvamitra, and this Rama is engendered at this age, that too with tribulations, hence taking Rama with you will be inappropriate of you. [1-20-10b, 11a]
GEM 3 – BUT U WILL SAY SO WHAT ? NEIN ! RAMA’S MOMMY GOT NO SPERM FROM DADDY – AND SO, SHE PERFORMED FELLATIO ON THE GOD OF SUN AND FIRE ,AND SWALLOWED THEIR SPERM !
Book I : Bala Kanda – The Youthful Majesties
Chapter [Sarga] 16
ततस्तु ताः प्राश्य तदुत्तमस्त्रियो
महीपतेरुत्तमपायसं पृथक् |
हुताशनादित्यसमानतेजसोऽ-
चिरेण गर्भान् प्रतिपेदिरे तदा || १-१६-३१
Then on consuming dessert those best ladies of the king whose resplendence then vied with that Fire and Sun became pregnant after some time. [1-16-31]
DESSERT = SPERMATAZOA
GEM 4 – RAMAS MOMMY ALSO HAD SEX WITH A HORSE
Book I : Bala Kanda – The Youthful Majesties
Chapter [Sarga] 14
Queen Kausalya desiring the results of ritual disconcertedly resided one night with that horse that flew away like a bird. [1-14-34]
GEM 5 – THIS IS PROOF OF THE 1 CENTIMETRE LIMPDICK OF RAMA
Book V : Sundara Kanda – Book Of Beauty
Chapter [Sarga] 35
18.
त्रिस्थिरः त्रिप्रलम्बः च त्रिसमः त्रिषु च उन्नतः |
त्रिवलीवान् त्र्यवनतः चतुः व्यन्गः त्रिशीर्षवान् || ५-३५-१७
He is undersized at four places (viz. the neck, membran virile, the back and the shanks). He is endowed with three spirals in the hair of his head.
ALL OF THE ABOVE PROVES THAT RAMA WAS A LIMPDICK AND A COWARD,WHO COULD NOT SATISFY SEEETA. BUT IN THE ABOVE VERSE, HANOOMAN IS DESCRIBING THE NAKED BODY OF RAMA TO SEETA ! 2 POINTS HERE
HOW DID HANOOMAN KNOW THE NAKED BODY OF RAMA ? SIMPLE ! RAMA AND HANOOMAN WERE GAY LOVERS WAS HANOOMAN TRYING TO AROUSE SEEETA ? Y ? BUT SHE WAS NOT AROUSED ? Y ? SHE WAS BANGING RAVANA !
NOW WE COME TO SEETA ! SHE WAS A NEPALEEE RANDEEE ON HEAT (LIKE ALL NEPALEE RANDIS)
GEM 6 – SEETA RANDI MAIYA ASKS Y RAMA DOES NOT FIND HER SEXUALLY ATTRACTIVE
Yuddha Kanda – Book Of War
Chapter [Sarga] 48
स्तनौ च अविरलौ पीनौ मम इमौ मग्न चूचुकौ |
मग्ना च उत्सन्गिनी नाभिह् पार्श्व उरस्कम् च मे चितम् || ६-४८-११
“My breasts are close to each other, fully developed and have depressed nipples. My navel is deeply idented. My flanks and bossom are well-formed.”
GEM 7 – SEETA WAS SEXUALLY STARVED AND FELL FOR RAVANA! THIS IS HOW RAVANA DESCRIBED HER,AND SHE LIKED IT ! IT WAS HER FIRST TIME ! SHE MET HIM COMPLETELY NAKED – ALMOST !
Book III : Aranya Kanda – Book Of Forest
Chapter [Sarga] 46
विशालम् जघनम् पीनम् ऊरू करि कर उपमौ |
एतौ उपचितौ वृत्तौ संहतौ संप्रगल्भितौ || ३-४६-१९
पीन उन्नत मुखौ कान्तौ स्निग्ध ताल फल उपमौ |
मणि प्रवेक आभरणौ रुचिरौ ते पयो धरौ || ३-४६-२०
“Your hips are beamy, thighs burly akin to elephant’s trunks, and these two breasts of yours that are ornamented with best jewellery are rotund, rubbing and bumping each other, and they are swinging up and up, their nipples are brawny and jutting out, and they are smoothish like palm-fruits, thus they are covetable for they are beautiful. [3-46-19, 20]
चारु स्मिते चारु दति चारु नेत्रे विलासिनि |
मनो हरसि मे रामे नदी कूलम् इव अंभसा || ३-४६-२१
करान्तमित मध्या असि सुकेशी संहत स्तनी
“Oh, allurer, your smile is alluring, teeth are alluring, and your eyes allure, oh, beauty, your waist is palmful, your hair velvety, your breasts are jostling, and you rob my soul as a spate robs riverbank. [3-46-21, 22a]
GEM 8 – AS PER RAMAYANA — THE HANOOMAN THE APE WAS GIVEN 16 SEX SLAVES BY BHARAT !
Book VI : Yuddha Kanda – Book Of War
Chapter [Sarga] 125
43-45
“O the gentle one! Are you a divine being or a human being, who have come here out of compassion? To you, who have given this agreeable news to me, I shall give in return, for the pleasant tidings, a hundred thousand cows, a hundred best villages, and for wives, sixteen golden complexioned virgin girls of a good conduct, decked with ear-rings, having beautiful noses and thighs, adorned with all kinds of jewels, with charming countenances as delightful as the moon and born in a noble family.”
Y DID BHARAT GIVE 16 SEX SLAVES TO THE APE ? THE PAWAN PUTTAR BRAHMA CHARI !
GEM 9 – RAMA ATE AND HUNTED DEER – JUST LIKE SALLU MIAN
Book II : Ayodhya Kanda – Book Of Ayodhya
Chapter[Sarga] 52
तौ तत्र हत्वा चतुरः महा मृगान् |
वराहम् ऋश्यम् पृषतम् महा रुरुम् |
आदाय मेध्यम् त्वरितम् बुभुक्षितौ|
वासाय काले ययतुर् वनः पतिम् || २-५२-१०२
Having hunted there four deer, namely Varaaha, Rishya, Prisata; and Mahaaruru (the four principal species of deer) and taking quickly the portions that were pure, being hungry as they were, Rama and Lakshmana reached a tree to take rest in the evening.
GEM 10 – RAMA TELLS SEETA THAT HE BROUGHT HER ONLY FOR “HIS HONOUR” AND NOTHING ELSE
Book VI : Yuddha Kanda – Book Of War
Chapter [Sarga] 115
विदितश्चास्तु भद्रं ते योऽयं रणपरिश्रमः |
सुतीर्णः सुहृदां वीर्यान्न त्वदर्थं मया कृतः || ६-११५-१५
रक्षता तु मया वृत्तमपवादम् च सर्वतः |
प्रख्यातस्यात्मवंशस्य न्यङ्गं च परिमार्जता || ६-११५-१६
“Let it be known to you that this endeavor in the shape of war, which has been successful carried through, due to the strength of my friends was not undertaken for your sake. Let there be prosperity to you! This was done by me in order to keep up my good conduct and to wipe off the evil-speaking from all sides as well as the insinuation on my own illustrious dynasty.”
GEM 11 – RAMA TELLS SEETA TO WHORE HERSELF TO DEMONS AND APES
Chapter [Sarga] 115
तदद्य व्याहृतं भद्रे मयैतत् कृतबुद्धिना |
लक्ष्मणे वाथ भरते कुरु बुद्धिं यथासुखम् || ६-११५-२२
“O gracious lady! Therefore, this has been spoken by me today, with a resolved mind. Set you mind on Lakshmana or Bharata, as per your ease.”
įatrughne vätha sugréve räkņase vä vibhéņaëe |
niveįaya manaų séte yathä vä sukhamätmanaų || 6-115-23
“O Seetha! Otherwise, set your mind either on Shatrughna or on Sugreeva or on Vibhishana the demon; or according to your own comfort.”
GEM 12 – CELIBACY OF HANOOMAN ? THIS IS HANOOMAN DESCRIBING SEEETAS BODY
Book V : Sundara Kanda – Book Of Beauty
Chapter [Sarga] 15
पूर्ण चन्द्र आननाम् सुभ्रूम् चारु वृत्त पयो धराम् || ५-१५-२८
कुर्वन्तीम् प्रभया देवीम् सर्वा वितिमिरा दिशः |
ताम् नील केशीम् बिम्ब ओष्ठीम् सुमध्याम् सुप्रतिष्ठिताम् || ५-१५-२९
सीताम् पद्म पलाश अक्षीम् मन्मथस्य रतिम् यथा |
Hanuma saw Seetha with a face like full moon, with beautiful eyebrows, with graceful rounded breasts, by the radiance making all directions without darkness, goddess like with black hair, with lips like bimba fruit, with a good waist, very firm, with eyes like lotus petals, like Rati the consort of god of love.
GEM 13 – This is proof that Ravana touched her body,waist and naked thighs
Book III : Aranya Kanda – The Forest Trek
Chapter [Sarga] 49
वामेन सीताम् पद्माक्षीम् मूर्धजेषु करेण सः |
ऊर्वोः तु दक्षिणेन एव परिजग्राह पाणिना || ३-४९-१७
He that Ravana grabbed the lotus-eyed Seetha on lifting her up with his left hand at her plait of hair at nape, and with his right hand at her thighs. [3-49-17]
ततः ताम् परुषैः वाक्यैः अभितर्ज्य महास्वनः |
अंकेन आदाय वैदेहीम् रथम् आरोपयत् तदा || ३-४९-२०
Then he whose voice is strident that Ravana lifted her up by her waist and got Vaidehi up on the air-chariot intimidating her with bitter words. [3-49-20]
AND RAVANA DID NOT DIE ! WHICH MEANS THAT SEETA MAIYA WENT WITH RAVANA WILLINGLY AS SHE WAS SEDUCED BY HIM ! SEETA MAIYA MIGHT HAVE HAD AFTER THOUGHTS ! BUT SHE WENT WITH RAVANA WILLINGLY – PERHAPS UNDER SEDUCTION OR HYPNOTISM – BUT THE NEPALI RANDI SEETA WENT WILLINGLY WITH RAVANA
Book VI : Yuddha Kanda – Book Of War
Chapter [Sarga] 116
यद्यहं गात्रसंस्पर्शं गतास्मि विवशा प्रभो |
कामकारो न मे तत्र दैवं तत्रापराध्यति || ६-११६-८
“O lord! It was not my willfulness, when I came into contact with the person of Ravana. I was helpless. My adverse fate was to blame on that score.”
मदधीनं तु यत्तन्मे हृदयं त्वयि वर्तते |
पराधीनेषु गात्रेषु किं करिष्याम्यनीश्वरा || ६-११६-९
“My heart, which was subservient to me, was abiding in you. What could I do, helpless as I was, with regard to my limbs which had fallen under the sway of another?”
GEM 14 – SEETA MIAYA SAYS THAT RAMA SHOULD RESCUE HER AND NOT BE “SCARED” THAT RAVANA WILL KIDNAP HER AGAIN
Book V : Sundara Kanda – Book Of Beauty
Chapter [Sarga] 68
Verses converted to UTF-8, Nov 09
यथा अहम् तस्य वीरस्य वनात् उपधिना हृता |
रक्षसा तत् भयात् एव तथा न अर्हति राघवः || ५-६८-१३
“‘Rama ought not to take me back for fear that Ravana, in the same manner as Ravana the demon took me away from the forest in the absence of Rama by cheating that heroic Rama.”
GEM 15 – RAMA ATE LIZARDS AND MONGOOSE
Book IV : Kishkindha Kanda – Chapter 17
पंच पंच नखा भक्ष्या ब्रह्म क्षत्रेण राघव |
शल्यकः श्वाविधो गोधा शशः कूर्मः च पंचमः || १-१७-३९
“Raghava, five kinds of five-nailed animals, viz., a kind of wild rodent, a kind of wild-boar, a kind of lizard, a hare and fifthly the turtle are edible for Brahmans and Kshatriya-s. [4-17-39]
GEM 16 – RAMA THE SNAKE,WEASEL AND IMPOTENT COWARD -AS PER VALI
Rama – The Snake
त्वया अदृश्येन तु रणे निहतो अहम् दुरासदः |
प्रसुप्तः पन्नगेन इव नरः पाप वशम् गतः || १-१७-४८
“An unassailable one, such as I am, I am killed by you while you remained invisible on the field of fight, as with a sinner bitten by a snake while he is asleep. [4-17-48]
Rama – The Weasel
Vali also says that had Rama fought with him face to face – Vali would have killed him !
दृश्यमानः तु युध्येथा मया युधि नृपात्मज |
अद्य वैवस्वतम् देवम् पश्येः त्वम् निहतो मया || १-१७-४७
“Had you been in combat with me en face oh, prince, you would have been killed by me and by now you would have seen the death-god Yama. [4-17-47]
Rama – The Impotent Coward
Vali also said that he would have brought Ravana by the scruff of his neck – which Rama could not do for 2 decades
“For which purpose I am killed, intending to do good to Sugreeva is incidental to it, you should have assigned me for that purpose in the first instance itself, and I would have brought that evil-minded demon Ravana, the abductor of your wife in one day, that too without killing him in any fight, but by fastening him by neck,and I would have presented Maithili to you. [3-17-49, 50]
GEM 17 – RAMA WAS A NEGROID WITH BLACK LOTUS SKIN
Book II : Ayodhya Kanda – Book Of Ayodhya
Chapter[Sarga] 2
तेषामायाचितं देव त्वत्प्रसादा त्समृद्ध्यताम् |
राममिन्दीवरश्यामं सर्वशत्रुनिबर्हणम् || २-२-५३
पश्यामो यौवराज्यस्थं तव राजोत्तमाऽअत्मजम् |
“Oh best of kings, Dasaratha ! We shall see Rama adorned with princely kingdom. Your son Rama has the complexion of a black lotus flower and annihilates all his enemies. Let the wish of the people be fulfilled by your grace.
Book VI : Yuddha Kanda – Book Of War
Chapter [Sarga] 128
आजानुलम्बिबाहुश्च महास्कन्धः प्रतापवान् |
लक्ष्मणानुचरो रामः पृथिवीमन्वपालयत् || ६-१२८-९७
That Rama, having his long arms reaching down his knees, having a broad chest and glorious, ruled this earth with Lakshmana as his companion.
BLACK SKIN + LONG ARMS = NEGROID AFRICAN
Mr. Sardana is a typical Muslim of India.