Secularism is not a choice, but a Duty


By Dr. Syed Shahab Ashraf

Seventy one years ago, on January 26, 1950, India adopted its new Constitution – a Constitution deeply embedded with the values of Secularism, Socialism, and Democracy which was framed after deliberate considerations, keeping in view the welfare of all the sections of the society as reflected in the Preamble which serves as its soul. The Preamble laid down the basic guidelines along which the social, economic, and political framework of the nation was to be structured. It also laid down the source from which the document derives its authority and meaning, and it is none other than “the People of India”. This Constitution and the values enshrined in it was the first step towards the fulfillment of the long held aspirations of a people who had achieved their freedom after a long struggle and innumerable sacrifices. The war for freedom was fought by the people of the country for the people of the country, thus making them the supreme authority to decide what kind of a country India should be, and the Preamble stands as a testimony to this historical moment conceding this historical fact.

The Preamble declares India a “Sovereign, Secular, Socialist, Democratic Republic”. Although the word ‘Secular’ (as well as ‘Socialist’) was incorporated in the Preamble in 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976, secularism has been an integral part of the Constitution since its very inception. The word “secular” was added later just to specify this secular character of the constitution which was already imbibed in it under its different Sections and Articles like Fundamental Rights. It emphasizes on “Justice” (Social, Economic and Political), “Equality” (of status and opportunity: Articles 14-18 of the Constitution of India), “Liberty” (of thought, expression, belief, faith and worship: Articles 19-22 & 25-30) and “Fraternity” (assuring the dignity of individual and the unity and integrity of the nation: Article 23 & 24). Upholding these values is the only way to keep India on the path of progress and development as was envisioned by its founding fathers. The range of diversity in India – social, cultural, lingual, ethnic, religious – is unsurpassed by any nation and needs to be preserved as this is what makes India a uniquely beautiful country. Our Constitution makers respected and upheld the idea of this diverse India by ensuring that no is discriminated against on any ground, as outlined in the Preamble to the Constitution which cannot be disregarded.

The fact that the Preamble forms an integral part of the Constitution and, therefore, constitutes the basic structure of the Constitution which cannot be altered is asserted by the Supreme Court of the country from time to time like in the Union Government v/s LIC of India case, 1995. The two milestone judgments wherein the Supreme Court of India developed jurisprudence around the “basic structure doctrine” of the Constitution and those enduring values that constitute the democratic essence of constitutionalism are Golaknath v/s State of Punjab, 1967, and Keshavnand Bharati v/s State of Kerala, 1973. In the first one, the Supreme Court held that Parliament cannot curtail any of the Fundamental Rights enshrined in the Constitution, and in the second, the Supreme Court outlined the “basic structure of the constitutional values and principles” and held that constitutional amendments under Article 368 which tend to affect the ‘basic structure of the Constitution’ are subject to judicial review. In its verdict, the court held that while the Parliament has “wide” powers to amend the Constitution and make laws, it does not have the power to destroy or emasculate the basic elements or fundamental features of the Constitution which include Federalism, Fundamental Rights, Secularism, Independent Judiciary and Parliamentary system of government etc.

Another landmark judgment in this regard came in S. R. Bommai v/s Union of India case, 1994, when President’s Rule under Article 356 was imposed in non-congress ruled states in the aftermath of demolition of Babri Masjid. The Court held that Secularism is one of the basic features of the Constitution of India, a positive concept of equal treatment of all religions, thus implying that the state has no right to favor or disfavor any religious sect. The Supreme Court of the country has, thus, always withheld the secular character of the state, emphasizing that principles and sanctity of our Constitution must be upheld while dealing with policies, rules and acts based on religious lines. “We, the People of India” gave this Constitution to ourselves so that our rights can be safeguarded and to ensure that all the people living within the boundaries of this nation can have a sense of dignity and security. Hence, in abiding by it alone lies the welfare of us all. It is our duty and obligation to respect its ideals and institutions and to save its soul, ensuring that nobody dares to kill it; because once the soul leaves a body, the body starts rotting and can never be revived. Let’s wake up before it’s too late.


The author is Assistant Professor at School of Engineering Sciences and Technology, Jamia Hamdard and Deputy Director at RCA.



  1. Indian constitution is made secular by Hindus only. On the other hand Muslim majority countries were made Islamic by muslims. This itself shows the difference between Hindu & Muslim mindset.
    Still muslims teach Hindus about secularism. It’s very funny..
    Why don’t you give secularism lecture to Islamic countries like Saudi or Iran? This is a clear hypocracy. Muslims want to keep their countries as Islamic and demand secularism in India.. Hahaha..

  2. Congress in 1976 deliberately added that dumb idea of secularism in decaying indian constitution.Muslims countries don’t have any secularism values so no retard muslim can expect india to be secular.i don’t believe in secularism and even in indian constitution.muslims where ever goes they start their holy war against non-muslims.killings,rapes,murders is the only thing muslims do in the name of deserve it.whats funny the muslims can’t live in their own country and fix things there but they go to other countries to destroy them by their islamic ideology.look SYRIA,PAKISTAN-IRAN and many more islamic nations fighting each other.can’t contribute in economy,can’t work,women’s are child production machines,no education,no ethics or values what muslims in forgein countries is free food,free house,per month package of money without doing anything and who pays for that the locals who give taxes to the govt.

  3. Dr. Syed Shahab Ashraf,

    Can a true muslim be ever Secular. Based on teachings of Quran, they are Momin, believer of one allah, one all non believers are Kafirs, Dhimmis who should be converted raped or killed or be considered and 3rd class citizen.

    The goal is to spread Islam.

    If Muslim becomes secular than it contradicts the teaching of Quran.

    Stop fooling non muslims. As a true momin one should speak the truth and openly say muslim can be only muslim and not secualr as it is against islam.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here